Maxxsure —
Cyber Risk Quantification, Cyber Insurance Analytics & Board Reporting
Maxxsure is a U.S.-based cyber risk quantification provider. The portfolio covers cyber risk management, cyber-insurance analytics, cyber risk quantification (CRQ), cyber-insurance brokerage support, risk exposure management and executive board-level risk reporting — translating technical security posture into financial-impact terms for CFO, board and insurance audiences. Fibi sources and negotiates Maxxsure on your behalf, at no cost to your business.
Portfolio
CRQ + Cyber Insurance Analytics + Risk Exposure + Board Reporting
Cyber risk management program, cyber-insurance analytics aligned to carrier underwriting, cyber risk quantification (CRQ), cyber-insurance brokerage support, ongoing risk exposure management and executive board-level reporting — translating security posture into financial-impact terms.
Cyber Risk Management Program
End-to-end cyber risk management program design and operation. Fitting operating models whose security program needs structured risk-management discipline aligned to enterprise risk practice rather than ad-hoc controls testing, and whose CISO function lacks the headcount to operate the framework themselves.
Cyber Insurance Analytics
Quantified cyber risk aligned to carrier underwriting questionnaires and policy structures. Fitting operating models whose insurance renewal cycle has tightened underwriting demands, whose retention and limit decisions cannot be made on intuition, and whose broker relationship benefits from underwriter-grade exposure data.
Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ)
Probability and impact estimates of cyber-loss events expressed in financial terms. Fitting operating models whose risk leadership cannot defend security investment requests on technical-control grounds alone, and whose board and audit committee require risk presented in the same financial language as other enterprise risks.
Cyber Insurance Brokerage Support
Underwriting-grade exposure data and submission support for cyber-insurance placement and renewal. Fitting operating models whose broker relationship needs defensible exposure data inputs to negotiate retention, limit, and premium positioning rather than self-reporting against questionnaires unprepared.
Risk Exposure Management
Ongoing exposure measurement against changes in threat landscape, controls posture and business operations. Fitting operating models whose risk register cannot be a point-in-time exercise, and whose audit, regulatory and insurance posture requires evidence of continuous risk monitoring rather than annual snapshot assessments.
Executive & Board-Level Risk Reporting
Board-ready cyber risk reports translating control posture and threat exposure into financial-impact narratives. Fitting operating models whose audit committee has formalized cyber oversight, whose D&O and regulatory posture requires documented board-level risk discussion, and whose CISO needs a reporting layer between technical detail and board fluency.
Ideal For
Operating Models Needing Cyber Risk in Financial Terms
Mid-Market & Enterprise Risk Programs
Mid-market and enterprise risk programs whose security investment defense, capital allocation and risk-acceptance decisions cannot be made on technical-control grounds alone and need defensible financial-loss probability and impact figures.
CFO-Led Cyber Insurance Renewals
CFO-led cyber-insurance renewal programs whose carrier underwriting demands have tightened and whose retention, limit and premium positioning need underwriter-grade exposure data rather than self-reported questionnaire answers prepared without analytical backing.
Public Co. & Audit-Committee Cyber Oversight
Public-company and regulated-entity operating models whose audit committee has formalized cyber oversight, whose SEC and D&O posture requires documented board-level risk discussion, and whose CISO needs a board-fluent reporting layer.
Programs Moving Beyond Heatmap Risk
Risk programs moving beyond colored-heatmap reporting toward quantified financial exposure, where the CFO, treasurer and risk leadership need cyber risk presented in the same dollar-impact framing as other enterprise risks.
Why Maxxsure
Where Maxxsure Stands Out as a Cyber Risk Quantification Provider
Structural advantages that justify Maxxsure over generic security tooling, technical audit firms or self-reported insurance questionnaires.
Quantifies cyber risk in dollar exposure terms rather than producing technical control gap reports — fitting operating models whose CFO, board and insurance broker need financial-loss probability and impact figures, and whose CISO function needs a defensible quantification methodology rather than colored heatmaps.
Outputs aligned to carrier underwriting questionnaires and policy structures — fitting operating models whose insurance renewal cycle has tightened, whose retention and limit decisions need underwriter-grade data, and whose broker relationship benefits from defensible exposure inputs rather than self-reported guesses.
Board-ready cyber risk reporting translating technical posture into financial impact — fitting operating models whose audit committee has formalized cyber oversight, whose D&O and SEC posture requires documented board-level risk discussion, and whose CISO needs a reporting layer between technical detail and board fluency.
Ongoing risk exposure measurement rather than point-in-time snapshots — fitting operating models whose risk register cannot be an annual exercise, and whose audit, regulatory and insurance posture requires evidence of continuous risk monitoring across changing threat landscape, controls and business operations.
Why Use Fibi
Maxxsure Direct vs. Maxxsure Through Fibi
Your contract is with Maxxsure either way. The difference is the comparison, sourcing and ongoing support layer around it.
| Aspect | Maxxsure Direct | Maxxsure Through Fibi |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Standard Maxxsure rates | Volume-negotiated — equal or better |
| Vendor comparison | Maxxsure only | Maxxsure vs other CRQ and cyber-insurance analytics providers |
| Quote turnaround | 5–10 business days | 24–72 hours across multiple options |
| Architecture review | Maxxsure consultants | Independent advisor representing your interests |
| Post-go-live support | Maxxsure support only | Fibi escalation + Maxxsure support |
| Advisory fee | N/A | $0 — provider-funded |
FAQ
Choosing Maxxsure for Cyber Risk Quantification & Insurance Analytics
Get a Maxxsure Quote Through Fibi
Fibi will scope your risk-program maturity, cyber-insurance renewal cycle, audit-committee reporting cadence and CFO defense requirements against Maxxsure and other CRQ and cyber-insurance analytics providers — so you see how Maxxsure compares on quantification depth, insurance alignment and total cost before signing, with no obligation and no sales pressure.
Compare Maxxsure against alternative cyber risk quantification providers